Last Stand in Sundan???

24 Apr

The African Union is saving lives and preventing atrocities in Darfur, but it needs help to reduce the violence and better protect civilians.

By Roberta Cohen and William G. O'Neill March/April 2006 pp. 51-58 (vol. 62, no. 02) © 2006 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Subscribe today!

On any given day, hundreds of women in displaced persons camps throughout Darfur can be seen nervously waiting for African Union (AU) troops before venturing outside to collect firewood for cooking.

"I would not go out of the camp if there weren't patrols by the African Union," said one displaced woman in Western Darfur. She feared rape by heavily armed Arab militias, known as the Janjaweed, who often surround and then attack the camps with the support of Sudan's military forces.

The African Union–not even four years old and badly underfunded, underequipped, and undermanned–has been struggling in Darfur to alleviate what has been called the world's "worst humanitarian disaster." Since the conflict in Sudan began in 2003, an estimated 180,000 to 300,000 people have been killed and 2 million displaced.

Protecting the 3.5 million people considered by the United Nations to be at risk–half of the population of Darfur–has become a test case for African peacekeeping. In its struggle to prevent atrocities, the African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) has had many small successes and has proven innovative in its methods. Despite serious handicaps, AMIS has saved lives and prevented even worse catastrophes for many internally displaced persons (IDPs). But the African Union faces crises of its own. With a weak mandate and near-empty coffers, AMIS is itself struggling to survive.

The AU's intervention in Darfur is a first for the organization, which replaced the 39-year-old Organization of African Unity (OAU) in 2002. The OAU was notorious for refusing to interfere in the "internal affairs" of member states, taking no action to prevent genocide in Rwanda or the brutal acts of Idi Amin in Uganda. By contrast, the AU is constitutionally structured to be able to collectively intervene in a member state to combat "war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity." (The AU is the world's only regional or international organization that explicitly recognizes the right to intervene in a member state on humanitarian and human rights grounds.)

As explained by Salim A. Salim, AU special envoy for Darfur and former OAU secretary-general, the AU was established to ensure that Africa would deal more decisively with African conflicts, a step necessary in part because international partners were unreliable. "It has not been easy to involve our Western partners in active peacekeeping in our continent," Salim said during a July 2005 presentation at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Western support is pivotal to the AU's capacity to achieve its mission. And Western nations have provided financial backing, airlift capacity, equipment, training, logistical support, and have assigned officers to help the AU improve its planning and command capabilities. But they have not sent troops, and financial aid has not always been forthcoming. (In December 2005, the U.S. Congress rejected a bill to renew $50 million in aid for Darfur, despite personal pleas from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.) And both African and Western governments have lined up behind the slogan "African solutions for African problems," using it as an excuse to avoid direct Western involvement in Darfur.

The full report can be read at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists/Last Stand in Sundan.


Posted by on April 24, 2006 in The Sudan


3 responses to “Last Stand in Sundan???

  1. edgery

    April 24, 2006 at 10:40 am

    It is imperative that we, every one of us, press our members of Congress to fully fund the US commitment to the AU, and to do everything humanly possible to stop the genocide in Darfur. If the United States does not stand against this continued atrocity, then what on earth do we stand for?!

    I just found this blog, through N Kristoff’s rec. Wonderful! I will spread the word to anyone and everyone I can. Thank you.

  2. cooper

    April 24, 2006 at 11:14 pm

    Thank you for spreading the word; it needs to be spread loud, clear and incessantly.

  3. Pam

    April 28, 2006 at 5:02 pm

    We must help the Sudanese people, because this is clearly GENOCIDE!!! Warnings were recieved and ignored during the Holocaust and Rwandan genocide, so will Sudan be just another example of where we stand before the victims’ graves and pledge the two words “never again”? We will regret not helping, whether it is encouragement towards the U.N or to the rest of the world. The U.S is responsible, being one of the most powerful nations in the world!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: