Escalation, questionable progress.

03 Oct

Not knowing where to begin.

We know not what to do. To not do we are called murderers, to do we are called murderers.

Saving Darfur with force

Sudan must save their people.

Sudan Times Breaking News On Darfur.

So far they are doing a shitty job of it.

Rebels attacking civilians in southern Darfur: AU

AFRICA: European Commission warning on Darfur

IN OUR OPINION: Raise Pressure To Save Darfur

Pressure from many quarters is closing in on the government of Sudan to end the violence that ravages the Darfur province. But more is needed, particularly from the United Nations.

The UN must overcome the reluctance of China and Russia, which have oil interests in Sudan, to persuade the government in Khartoum to let in the troops and humanitarian groups that can stop the exodus and genocide of its own citizens. So far, government-armed militants have killed more than 200,000 people and displaced more than 2 million. Security continues to deteriorate, and aid workers are targeted.

Baby steps have been taken against this breathtaking inhumanity. In recent weeks:

• The United Nations got Sudan to allow African Union troops to stay through the end of the year, supported by about 100 UN military advisers.

• U.S. President George W. Bush has tapped Andrew Natsios, the respected former chief of USAID, as a special envoy to the region.

• Europe has pledged anew $50 million in aid to the war-torn region.

• Actor George Clooney is using the power of his celebrity to “shine the light” not only on Darfur, but also on the people best able to solve the problem: the members of the United Nations.

Think a Hollywood heartthrob has no place in such a weighty debate? Think again. Cameras and publications hang on Clooney’s every move and word. It was his presence at the United Nations last week, more than the moving words of Holocaust survivor Elie Weisel, that drew the media’s attention.

Every bit of pressure matters. And still it’s not enough.

Nobody can have the influence of the United Nations when its members unanimously condemn genocide and dispatch troops. Any one nation could lead the charge, but the United Nations is uniquely situated to coordinate efforts and is, sadly, schooled in responding to humanitarian crises.

The beleaguered and inexperienced African Union forces — 7,000 — can’t match the janjaweed militia, even with strategic help from the United Nations. A proposed 20,000-plus UN force would be better equipped to exert control in this chaos. The United Nations has been too willing to let Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir block the UN presence.

Part of the problem has been China, not known for a stellar human rights record of its own. But even that nation must be brought on board to force the sanctions that may be necessary to get al-Bashir’s attention.

He has not responded to the suffering of his people. Maybe once he feels the heat, he will let others provide the safety and comfort he has so long refused to supply. If that doesn’t happen quickly, the United Nations will have to parachute in, welcome or not.

Q&A: Sudan’s Darfur conflict


Posted by on October 3, 2006 in Bookmarks


4 responses to “Escalation, questionable progress.

  1. Tim

    October 7, 2006 at 8:46 pm

    Well, cooper, will you lead the UN charge? You do know, do you not, that not only will UN forces be fighting the Sudan military, but also the (currently pro-Khartoum but being courted by al Qaeda to turncoat) Janjawid and the rebel groups, the pro-Sharia Justice and Equality Movement, and the Sudan Liberation Army. Further, do not doubt that Libya will not miss the opportunity to jump into the fray.

  2. cooper

    October 7, 2006 at 10:03 pm

    My personal opinion on this is not necessarily stated here. I do feel that the women being raped and the children being starved might not share your opinion.

    What is it, natural selection only the fittest survive? Too many people on this earth anyway some have to die right? Might as well be the women and babies is Darfur – fucking cowards.

    Be sure that if the UN did come in full force there would be no contest but that having been said it is not going to happen and we know it, I prefer it not to happen anyway. I would have no intention of leading a UN charge; I guess it’s all really funny to you eh.

    I would prefer that they fully fund and support the African Union to the point of a billion or two billion or ten billion dollars if that is what it takes to protect and allow aid in to feed and give medical care to these people until the fuck wads in The Sudan and wherever else can get their collective heads out of their murderous, greedy little asses.

  3. cooper

    October 7, 2006 at 10:20 pm

    On second thought I’d prefer to fund mercenary training for the women and children of Darfur so they could blow the heads of those who perpetrate the crimes upon them.

    That would be what I would do were it s possibilty.

  4. Tim

    October 8, 2006 at 12:10 am

    Rape makes for sensational headlines, headlines that disguise the numbers of men killed on both sides each day and aid workers who are attacked not only by government forces but more often by rebel groups.

    Look at what is happening in Iraq. That is what Sudan will be if the UN tries to interpose.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: