IRRESOLUTION: The U.N. Security Council on Darfur – Enough Project

25 Jul

Last week’s move by the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, or ICC, to seek an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir introduces a new point of leverage with the Sudanese government and provides an opportunity for the U.N. Security Council to demand real changes in Khartoum’s policies and behavior. Unfortunately, the historical record suggests that the Council will likely miss this opportunity as it has missed many others during the past five years.

Read the report here.

In the ENOUGH Project’s latest report, “Irresolution: The U.N. Security Council on Darfur,” Co-Chair John Prendergast and Research Associate David Sullivan diagnose the underlying obstacles to effective Security Council response, providing a practical guide on how activists can better engage their governments to stop-and ultimately prevent-genocide and crimes against humanity. “Blaming the Council as an institution is counterproductive,” says Prendergast. “Instead, constituencies that care about Darfur and other places of conflict must focus on decisions made by individual member states and push their governments to invest the diplomatic capital to make Security Council resolutions more likely to be transformed from rhetoric to reality on the ground.”

Read the report here.

ENOUGH Project | 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 307 | Washington, DC 20005
ENOUGH is a project to end genocide and crimes against humanity. For more information, go to



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: